Political Polls: Manufactured News - Part 3

To see a list of all commentaries, click the above picture.

Incoming Political Storm: The 2030 Census - Part 1

Incoming Political Storm: The 2030 Census - Part 2

Political Polls: Manufactured News - Part 1

Political Polls: Manufactured News - Part 2

Quick Review

Previously in this three-part series, consideration has been given to various aspects of the polling industry, particularly where political polling is concerned. These include 1) the manufactured character of polls, 2) the manipulation of polls, 3) the importance of the identity of the poll sample, 4) the character of poll modeling, and 5) the impact of poll questions as well as other considerations. In this, the third and final entry in this series, the reasons for poll manipulation will be given a serious look. Enjoy the read.

Answering an Age-Old Question

Each of these survey components mentioned above plays a large role in developing what one hopes will be an honest reveal of public opinion. Why, then, are so many pollsters so wrong, and why do they keep getting repeat customers? Let’s answer the second part of this question first, as that answer is far less complicated.

Why does any company experience repeat business? The no-nonsense answer is that an individual or group returns to a vendor because they were satisfied with their previous experience. It stands to reason, then, that people return to a given polling company because they were equally satisfied with the pollster’s work. While the pollster may not have provided accurate results, per se, it must be that the returning client (political group or politician) was satisfied that they got what they paid for.

Of course, the above question contained two parts. The first part of the question concerned why so many pollsters seem to get the numbers wrong on a consistent basis. The second part of the question considered why pollsters who were consistently wrong receive repeat business. Having answered the second part of the question, let’s consider why so many pollsters are so wrong on a regular basis.

If customers return to a pollster because they believe they got what they paid for, the only reasonable conclusion is that the pollster was intent on providing the customer with certain results. Political clients want polls to report that the citizenry views them favorably. While it may not be completely true, it offers the perception that an independent company – the polling company – has provided data they can deliver to the public, hopefully using that data to influence voters concerning electability. There may be other reasons that customers return to a polling company that provides inaccurate results, but this reasoning makes the most sense.

Why would an honest polling company knowingly and willingly publish results that are less than accurate? Well, it may involve redefining the word “honest.” Yet, that statement may not be a fair assessment. After all, if the pollster is providing what the customer wants, can they really be called dishonest?

The Why

As has already been discussed, part of the reason a pollster may report skewed results is that they are fully aware of the customer’s expectations. That is to say, either directly (through conversation) or indirectly (through experience) they are aware of the kind of results a particular client hopes to see. However, that is not the only reason skewed polling results are reported publicly.

If a polling company consistently reports results that ultimately end up well off the mark, one would think that the firm would be concerned about public perception and loss of credibility. It stands to reason, then, that they would seek to address the issues that led to those skewed results. However, as long as customers keep returning and the money keeps flowing, correcting flawed polling models is not necessarily the highest priority.

Some may wonder why politicians would desire skewed polling results. After all, it makes sense that a politician or political group would seek accurate polling so they could make informed decisions. However, the truth is that politicians and political groups already have access to accurate polling. Each political party and groups within those parties have what are called internal polls. These are polls whose results are not generally released to the public and they are geared toward providing unbiased results.

While it is not true of every public poll, the results of public polling may be considered political theater. In fact, it is probably safe to say that much of what the public sees in the political arena may be considered political theater. For instance, prior to the 2024 presidential election, polls were mixed with certain polls suggesting a semi-solid win for Kamala Harris. In the aftermath of the election, however, Kamala’s team reportedly admitted that their internal polling never showed Harris leading Trump during the campaign. Consequently, politicians do not generally use information from public polls to make political decisions, although they often tout public polling results as a matter of publicity.

An example of incredulous polling results can be seen in the state of Iowa. The weekend prior to the 2024 election, a poll from a relatively credible polling source was released in Iowa showing Kamala Harris with a 3-point lead over Donald Trump in that state. Yet, Donald Trump won Iowa by 13 points. While this is not a claim of nefarious activity, one wonders how a firm that has built a solid reputation over many years would go public with what were clearly bogus numbers in favor of the losing candidate.

There is an additional reason behind skewed polling results, and that involves a polling company’s own political bias. There is in America a polling trend where polling results have been skewed in a particular direction over the past few decades. While it is not true in every instance, much of the public polling in America has heavily favored those on the left side of the political aisle. According to Quantus Insights – one of the most accurate pollsters of the 2024 election – polling bias has become egregiously slanted over the past couple of decades, stating:

From 2000 to 2012, polling was reliable, with national errors averaging 1.5 points and not partisan bias. Since 2016, errors have grown, become directional, and consistently favor Democrats, revealing a structural crisis.[1]

The above quote is from an article titled: The Polling Crisis: Accuracy, Bias, and Reform in U.S. Political Surveys (2000–2024) Those of you who are interested in this topic might take the time to look up this article online as it packed with valuable information and insights into the political polling industry. It would be time well-spent,

A strong case could be made that this strategic, left-leaning bias predates 2016. Still, since Quantus Insights is one of the best when it comes to polling, it seems reasonable to defer to their wisdom and expertise. However, this bias factor does beg the question: Why do so many polling firms lean left? The simplest, most straight-forward answer is two-fold. First, it may be what the client pays for. Second, it is reflective of the political leanings of those who conduct the surveys.

It is safe to say that polling numbers falling well outside the m.o.e. of the averages of other pollsters have been produced as a result of political bias. Left-leaning bias throughout the industry has led to the public perception that polls reporting reasonable numbers for Republicans must come from companies leaning heavily to the right, but this is not true. Indeed, the more accurate polling results are delivered by firms like Rasmussen, Trafalgar, Quantus Insights, Insider Advantage, and Big Data Poll. Since these firms tend to provide more accurate results, it is reasonable to say that their models and questions involve less political bias than firms with heavily-slanted results.

This bias has also been seen among polling aggregates where more accurate pollsters are viewed with skepticism and given less weight simply because their results fail to provide the desired/anticipated outcomes. Conversely, those with clear left-leaning political bias are weighted more heavily and even highlighted and praised for their work.

Public Impact

There is an additional factor that must not be overlooked when it comes to political polls. While sites like Real Clear Politics offer raw polling data for public viewing, only true political enthusiasts tend to visit those kinds of sites. Consequently, most members of the general public receive polling information through what can only be described as an overwhelmingly biased media. Given that the legacy media tend to lean heavily to the left when it comes to politics, networks, etc., are inclined to report to the public in a manner that best reflects their political bent. Thus, it is not unusual for them to favorably report on polls and any other available information favoring the left while ignoring or downplaying polls that reflect favorably on more conservative candidates.

As skewed polls propagate through the media, they have the capacity to sway public perception, creating a feedback loop where voters feel compelled to align their views with those that seem to dominate. Consequently, this phenomenon can suppress honest discourse and genuine reflection on political issues, as individuals may hesitate to express dissenting opinions against the perceived poll results. This dynamic not only alters individual voting behavior but also the broader political landscape, as skewed perceptions can lead to a misinformed electorate eager to follow perceived trends rather than engage thoughtfully with the issues at hand.

The primary purpose of political polls has traditionally been to gauge public opinion. However, over the years, the role of polls has evolved significantly, morphing from simple reflections of societal sentiment into tools that can actively influence opinion and behavior. In contemporary political landscapes, the implications of polls extend beyond measurement of public sentiment; often molding the very opinions they purport to reflect.

Conclusion: The Real Power of Political Polls

In the landscape of a society built on democratic principles, political polls serve as more than mere reflections of public sentiment; they have evolved into influential instruments capable of shaping political narratives and swaying voter behavior. Throughout this discussion, it has become apparent that the wording, methodology, and presentation of poll results play pivotal roles in determining how such data is perceived and utilized by both the public and political entities.

One of the critical aspects highlighted is the manipulative potential of poll wording. Carefully chosen phrases can engender specific emotional responses, effectively embedding bias within the results. This represents a fundamental challenge to the integrity of the polling process, emphasizing the necessity for critical engagement with poll results on the part of consumers and analysts alike.

Moreover, the influence of political polls extends beyond immediate election cycles; they can set the stage for political agendas, tap into prevailing sentiments, and even influence shifts in public opinion. The understanding that polls can be leveraged to establish narratives or reinforce ideologies underscores the importance of scrutinizing their underlying intentions and implications. As evidenced by numerous elections, polls have the capacity to forecast outcomes, yet it is crucial to acknowledge their role as instruments of persuasion rather than mere mirrors of the electorate's mood.

Recognizing the multifaceted nature of political polls is essential. By viewing polls as powerful tools that shape not only electoral outcomes but also the broader political discourse, voters can better appreciate their impact on the political process. It is imperative that public political polls be viewed skeptically in order to ensure a more informed and discerning electorate capable of navigating the complexities of political life in America.

Given the complexities involved in polling, Constitution Matters will, for the 2026 election, attempt to serve as a limited polling aggregate, focusing on political races that are most relevant to the mid-term election. That page can be found under "Election 2026" in the menu at the top of this page. Polling data will be introduced on that page sometime in the coming summer months as the election draws near.

                                          End Part 3

[1] The Polling Crisis: Accuracy, Bias, and Reform in U.S. Political Surveys (2000–2024), accessed March 7, 2026

See below for contact information

This book will truly enhance your understanding of the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. Click the button below to check it out.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________